Author Topic: cameras  (Read 3006 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil

  • happily married, working on immigration
  • Registered User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,000
  • Reputation: 5
  • Zhangping, Fujian bound.
cameras
« on: February 15, 2010, 11:49:47 pm »
I've never seen a resolution number.  my camera takes pictures at 1600x1200 and I cut 'em in half - 50% to 800x600 which seems to fit a lot better (I think).  Does that mean 72 dots per inch or something?
« Last Edit: February 16, 2010, 01:16:31 am by maxx »
...as irresistible as chocolate

Offline mustfocus

  • Registered User
  • ***
  • Posts: 739
  • Reputation: 12
RE: Chengdu....The story begins...... !!!
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2010, 12:22:41 am »
Resolution is how many pixels your camera can support.  Generally I tell people when they are taking pictures, take them at the best quality and biggest size you can get out of it.  The thing to remember is you can always reduce the resolution (size) and quality (detail level) of the picture.  But you can't raise the resolution or quality of the picture from something lower.

72dpi is part of the resolution of the image (it's been many moons since I had to explain this part).  72dpi is the standard for viewing on the web.  For photo reprinting, you should aim higher.

Vince could probably explain this one better.
梦醒时分 - Meng Xing Shi Fen

Offline mustfocus

  • Registered User
  • ***
  • Posts: 739
  • Reputation: 12
RE: Chengdu....The story begins...... !!!
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2010, 12:41:08 am »
Vince,

You don't want a large poster of your lady? :icon_biggrin:

All kidding aside, you're right no-one needs anything really bigger than a 5MP, but then you also get bragging rights. :icon_biggrin: And like I said, you can always downsize the photo.  You can't really upsize the photo once it's been taken (at least making it clear).

Exact opposite of cooking...you can always add more to the recipe, but you can't take out what's already been mixed.
梦醒时分 - Meng Xing Shi Fen

shaun

  • Guest
RE: cameras
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2010, 10:18:25 pm »
Vince,

That is what you say to make yourself feel better. :icon_cheesygrin:

the artist formerly known as Blind Baby.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2010, 10:20:21 pm by shaun »

rockycoon

  • Guest
RE: cameras
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2010, 11:23:52 pm »
Now I am confused...:huh::huh:

Guess I'll just use the one out of the crackerjack box, I've been using...:s

Isn't 800 x 600 called EGA and above that VGA ?
« Last Edit: February 16, 2010, 11:26:12 pm by rockycoon »

Offline mustfocus

  • Registered User
  • ***
  • Posts: 739
  • Reputation: 12
RE: cameras
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2010, 11:38:05 pm »
My philosophy is to buy the best camera you can afford at the time...Before I had the S500 (CF camera) with 5MP...that one died and the guys at the various repair shops said it's not worth it to repair... so I got a 14MP next (mostly because it was a P&S with a real viewfinder instead of using the LCD screen).  Now you look at Canon's lineup and only the really high end have a real viewfinder.
梦醒时分 - Meng Xing Shi Fen

ttwjr32

  • Guest
RE: cameras
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2010, 07:47:07 pm »
sonny and cher  wow thats going back in time :icon_cheesygrin:

rockycoon

  • Guest
RE: cameras
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2010, 08:42:09 pm »
Vince, your betraying your age...time to up that photo of you at 20...:icon_cheesygrin: